SCHEDULE

2009 Southeast Arkansas Regional Science Fair

Practice your scientific notation here.

Question 1:     How many new high schools, costing $115 million each, could be built for $ 2.3 trillion?

Question 2:     How many new $115 million high schools would Arkansas get if we assume that Arkansas is an 'average' state?

        Can't believe it?    Visit   Project Vote Smart !

Question 3:    Did you notice the date that the "missing" $2.3 trillion was announced?

Question 4:    Do you remember what happened the very next day?

Check out the growing peer-reviewed consensus concerning the events of 911 at the Journal for 911 Studies and at Scholars for 911 Truth & Justice .

German Engineers Help The USA What Had Happened Exactly on 9-11-2001?

If you are a bit behind the curve, The Demolitions is a good place to start. There are even some shots of the angled cuts made on the core columns just as in any other demolition.

Once you are able to accept the facts, maybe you will be able to find the courage to take a stand for the truth.  A concise summary and an invitation to join the bandwagon has been produced by S911T.

So should Dick Cheney be impeached ? 

For another  historical example of rouge elements planning to kill American citizens for political advantage,  read about Operation Northwoods.  The American President  JFK canceled Operation Northwoods before he was murdered.

The President immediately preceding JFK, the Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in "the big one", and the last True Republican president had warned us beforehand:

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
Dwight D. Eisenhower

A Tale of Two Conspiracy Theories

No one has ever claimed that the psy-war attacks were the work of a "lone gunman". So every theory ever advanced has been a "conspiracy theory" and anyone attempting to understand those attacks is by definition a "conspiracy theorist". Lets look at a couple of these conspiracy theories.

Theory A	Theory X
Motive: The terrorists wanted to cover up the 2.3 trillion already stolen (see Practice your scientific notation above) and acknowledged on 9/10, the day before the attacks . Even more motivation was provided by the additional trillions that had been carefully accumulated in the national surplus in the nineties and that would have been used for the health care and education of Americans. Since those attacks, further trillions that could have gone into the surplus have instead been diverted to the no-bid contracts for the war machine. Apparently, the end is not yet in sight for the huge stream of national resources that continues to bleed into the terrorists' control.	Motive: Let's see, I believe we were told that, "They hate us for our freedom".
Opportunity: See the Eisenhower quote above and ... to be cont. ...	Opportunity: You've got to be joking.  It was so easy that 19 guys with box cutters working out of a cave in Afghanistan could do it?  We're just  lucky  that none of the Iranians, or Cubans, or commies, or  (fill in the blank) _____ ... , ever wanted to do it?
Means: See the Eisenhower quote above.	Means: Box cutters and a cave in Afghanistan?

It often takes courage to do the right thing. You can thank Lt. Watada for his bravery and loyalty to American ideals here.

Update, update! The criminals are starting to blink!

Lt. Watada repeatedly told the judge on Monday and Tuesday morning, before the trial began, that he agreed with the 12-page "stipulation of facts" that was provided to the panel of seven officers as evidence of most of the key events in this case. The lieutenant reminded the judge in every response that he continued to believe that his orders to go to Iraq were illegal.

The document was prepared by the government. When construing a document, it is interpreted in favor of the person who did not prepare it.

It was signed by all parties over a week ago. This was not a last-minute task.

The judge was satisfied. The stipulation was accepted by the court and distributed to the panel Tuesday morning.

The panel proceeded to hear the entire prosecution case on Tuesday: the 12-page written stipulation, two videos that were also part of the stipulation, and three prosecution witnesses that appeared to aid Lt. Watada's theory of the case.

The judge raised concerns about the document on Wednesday morning, moments before Lt. Watada was set to take the witness stand.

The Seattle Times reported that "The defense and prosecution teams both believed the agreement did not constitute an admission of guilt. But the judge on Wednesday said the agreement included all the elements required to find Watada guilty.

Lt. Watada's attorney, Eric Seitz, said that the stipulation was not an admission of guilt.

"No. Absolutely no way," he said. "Lt. Watada's a smart guy. He knew exactly what he was agreeing to." (Los Angeles Times)

The judge turned to the prosecution and said "I can't unring that bell." But then, in what appeared to be a moment of panic, he suggested to the prosecution that they recall their witnesses. He warned them that he was considering issuing a mistrial. He offered to let them reopen their case if they wanted to. He offered them whatever time they needed to make a decision "thirty minutes, an hour, or more." When the prosecution assured the judge that they only needed thirty minutes, there was a disappointed look on his face.

Apparently the defense was also asked if it would be willing to withdraw the stipulation and let the case proceed on that basis. As the panel had been relying on the stipulation throughout the prosecution case, the defense was not willing to do anything of the sort.

Upon the prosecution's return, they asked for a mistrial. The defendant opposed it. The motion was granted, and a new trial date was set.

Thank you Lieutenant!

She's only 15 but it is still a fact that Peace takes Courage . ( I like "The Time is Now".)

Watchdogs Urge Full Probe of Bush Propaganda Spending
By Niko Kyriakou
OneWorld.net

Wednesday 22 February 2006 Go to Original

San Francisco - Media reform groups are calling for a deeper investigation of Bush administration advertising and propaganda efforts following the release of a report that concludes the White House has spun a web of public relations (PR) contracts larger than previously thought.

At issue are agreements to produce everything from advertisements to video news releases - government-vetted spots designed to air alongside and to be indistinguishable from regular televised news reports.

Critics of the state-sponsored content said it constitutes part of a broader government attack on press freedom and that it amounts to a subversion of democracy.

"When elected public servants use taxpayer dollars to manipulate or deceive the very people whose consent they require for their legitimacy, our public servants then become our masters," said Sanho Tree, a fellow at the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Policy Studies.

The official Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported last week that government agencies have spent about $1.6 billion over the past 30 months on PR and advertising contracts.

... "Historically, propaganda has always merged with recruitment because people must first be conditioned to become soldiers and fight strangers in distant lands," said propaganda expert and author Nancy Snow. That kind of spending likely will remain largely hidden and is unlikely to shrink without public pressure for transparency and budget cuts, she said.

The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of international law. The invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of the public; an act intended to consolidate American military and economic control of the Middle East masquerading - as a last resort - all other justifications having failed to justify themselves - as liberation. A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands and thousands of innocent people. We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East'. How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice. But Bush has been clever. He has not ratified the International Criminal Court of Justice... Death in this context is irrelevant. Both Bush and Blair place death well away on the back burner. At least 100,000 Iraqis were killed by American bombs and missiles before the Iraq insurgency began. These people are of no moment. Their deaths don't exist. They are blank. They are not even recorded as being dead. 'We don't do body counts,' said the American general Tommy Franks ... The 2,000 American dead are an embarrassment. They are transported to their graves in the dark. Funerals are unobtrusive, out of harm's way. The mutilated rot in their beds, some for the rest of their lives. So the dead and the mutilated both rot, in different kinds of graves.” -Nobel Laureate Harold Pinter

Cindy

Why and how to bring the troops home NOW !

Should Americans have the Freedom to Read ?

Praying Peace

Three sites for getting help using your graphing calculator:

• Prentice Hall help for Sharp, HP, Casio, and TI models                                                     

• Texas Instruments help for TI models

• About Mathematics  graphing calculator guides