|
Why not Resources |
Knight Ridder Newspapers HARRISBURG, Pa. - Charles Darwin might not be in the federal courtroom to hear witnesses challenge his theory of evolution. But his DNA is. As one of Darwin's most vocal modern-day critics testified in a landmark lawsuit last week, the eminent scientist's great-great-grandson sat six feet away in the jury-box-turned-press box. In the courtroom, Matthew Chapman, a New York author and screen writer, is one of the 75 reporters from the United States and abroad covering the Dover School Board trial, the first court proceeding ever on the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution. But outside the court, Chapman recognizes that he plays other roles: lightning rod for the anti-evolution crowd and a living connection to the 19th century scientist whose theories on natural selection and the origin of species provide the foundation for modern biology. Chapman, 55, a British-born American citizen, says he is stunned that debate continues in the United States 140 years after Darwin's death and 80 years after the Scopes "monkey trial." "Evolution is such a non-issue everywhere else in the world," said Chapman, who counts among his screenwriting credits the John Grisham thriller "Runaway Jury." Chapman, who is on assignment for Harper's Magazine and also is working on a documentary for the BBC, has tried to remain an observer on the sidelines, joining the press gaggle, tape recorder in hand, after court each day. He also has been spending time in Dover, talking to students and sitting quietly through anti-evolution speeches by local ministers. "This is really the first courtroom scientific debate, since science wasn't allowed in the courtroom in the Scopes trial," Chapman said. Last week he listened to testimony from the lead witness for the defense -- Lehigh University biochemist Michael Behe -- and intently scribbled in his notebook. Behe, author of the bestselling book "Darwin's Black Box," testified that what he calls the "purposeful arrangement of parts" in certain biochemical processes is evidence that intelligent design is a scientific idea. "I'm appalled by the lack of respect for the evidence," Chapman said. "Darwin spent 23 years compiling evidence he gathered to present his theory." Behe said later he was not surprised when Chapman turned up a few feet away from the witness stand. "Oddly, I felt reassured by his presence," said Behe, who met Chapman during a break in the trial. "He's such a friendly guy, like I imagine Darwin was, who's interested in chewing over ideas." Chapman says he is amused by the tone of some evolution opponents who spit out the word "Darwinists" with the same vitriol as the word "Communists" was uttered during the Red Scare in the `50s. Among those Darwin foes Chapman has encountered was the Rev. Jim Grove, of Heritage Baptist Church, easily the most vocal creationist in the Dover area. Grove organized a mid-trial event attended by 150 people titled, "More Reasons Why Evolution Is Stupid." Chapman said he feared evangelicals such as Grove are more concerned "with the future of their souls than the future of American education." Grove said he hoped to interview Chapman one day, perhaps influence him. "He isn't what we would call saved," Grove said. "We're praying for him." Chapman said he doesn't feel defensive about his ancestry. "The only time I've felt proud of being descended from Darwin is in opposition to creationists," he said.
___ © 2005, The Philadelphia Inquirer. _____ Have a comment? Please e-mail us.© The Voice 2005 Revised 09/17/2007 02:17:12 PM — http://www.uamont.edu/organizations/thevoice/3_8/krt.htm |
